Sup folks.Maybe it's time for an English-only thread? It's been a while without one. It seems like without a proper practicing your language abilities deteriorating like mad. I found it rather funny that most of the anons on this site are constantly bragging about their salaries and unbelievable income made off of their IT undertakings and yet when there's an English-only thread there's always like 1.5 anon talking about anything. Such a beautiful tongue that is and yet you continue to batter your tongue with that gibberish Slavic language of yours. Who's with me on this one? I assume it's really hard to make a living without English nowadays. Prove me wrong.
And a quick question for the gods who're able to understand me without that puny google translate made (obviously) for peasants. How many languages do you know besides English? How do you maintaining all of them? It could be a difficult task, living in the middle of nowhere. Hope yall doing well.
Since OP avoided constructing any specific topic, I feel obligated to bring politics into this thread. My original statement is related as a pic.Your move, anons.
>>192727980 (OP)Don't flatter yourself, there are heaps of room for improvement. In saying that, I've got to admit that you're not half bad, and you will most definitely achieve substantial results with more practice.
>>192728943>constitutional monarchy. laughs hysterically in arabicHave you seen London lately, young lad?
>>192728356Actually, only English. Funny story, I actually started learning German in 5th grade and was relatively good other dumbasses from class couldn't even say a couple of word in German without stammering but in 9th grade I started doing evening courses at our local linguistic uni and was doing them for 2 years. After those courses I went to head of my scholl and asked for transfer to English group, and since I was the only student going for a golden medal for reasons check previous spoiler they transfered me withiut even any documents.
>>192729374It's near impossible to find an adequate substitute that would be idiomatic enough. The closest I can think of is "Go fuck yourself, faggot!"
>>192729104If parents don’t violate NAP, their children have little to no chance of surviving.Breathing violates NAP, because while doing it you strive towards ending oxygene and thus killing individuals without their consent. Otherwise releasing chlorine into your neighbor’s garden isn’t a violation of NAP.With few exceptions, each single human being on Earth in some way negatively affects lives of millions. It is physically impossible to create a society where that isn’t a thing.NAP is an entirely meaningless concept.
>>192729828Use some kind of a bait next time. No one in Russia is self-conscious about English knowledge.
>>192729268Have you seen Haiti throughout it’s entire existence?The failures of modern Britain aren’t an argument against monarchy.By the way, London is still doing better than, say, republican Paris.
>>192729828Then would you be so kind as to provide an example of a successful constitutional monarchy at work?
>>192728356Russian is my mother tongue so that pretty much counts. Maintaining a language is no problem if you live among people speaking it.
>>1927299891. Children living on property of their parents and they (parents) have right to partially violate NAP.2. Children can violate NAP too.>Otherwise releasing chlorine into your neighbor’s garden isn’t a violation of NAP.On this happening we have contract jurisdiction conception.
>>192730618Imagine I'm a white baby boomer with a blooming beer belly smirking ironically looking at this thread and everything is gonna be all right or... ALT RIGHT
>>192727980 (OP)Igor, you? Remember me? I'm your classmate. I recognized you by your schizoid words and vysery. Do you remember how the whole class pissed you into a mug in the third grade, on a sweet tooth? You drank more, licked my lips and asked for supplements. And then your father came to take you away, the same janitor who raped a dog on Vernadsky and received a suspended sentence for stealing the processed cheese in the store. He entered the class, everyone began to laugh, and you crap under you from shame, and then said that you would hate wipers all your life, but in the 9th grade, when you went to the raid to otpidd, they let you go in a circle, after which eight seams were put on your anus. How are you, Igoryan?
>>192730794If i told you, what 2 times per day i ordering pizza florentina per 15$ and latte cofee per 10$? And for this night i prepared the bottle of Jack Daniels from London?
>>192730958Okay, this is beyond mundane language usage. Sir, wouldn't it be bold of me to assume you're working with the language professionally?
>>192731090you eat the food of the beggars and you drink the drink for the cattle, you cannot consider yourself to be white people, you are pathetic garbage
>>192730231Then would you be so kind as to provide an example of a successful constitutional monarchy at work?I'm still waiting.
>>1927305831. What if a child escapes?2. And then their parents are allowed to kill them right away?3. What if you don’t agree on which court to use? What if the court you finally chose makes an incompetent decision and enforces it? Does it violate NAP? Who decides? Is court allowed to decide anything it pleases? That concept is bullshit as well.
>>192731173Your assumption is correct, my friend. My career revolves around creating believable copy for various digital marketing purposes.
>>192731625That's the perfect example of littering one's vocabulary with slang. It's degrading. Wouldn't you rather be able to produce something more intelligent?
>>192731303In what sense is UK not working? It is in crisis for sure but still is a good place to live and one of the most “working” nations.But if you wanted to ask for an ideal example, take Japan.
>>192731501Hats off for you. I'm always glad to see the kind of you in English-only threads. Inspirational to say the least. Of course, my vocabulary pales against yours but nonetheless inspires me to dig deeper into the language even though I'm aint a professional.
Hello dear Martin Alekseich! I am writing to you immediately upon arrival, right here I just entered and sat down to write. Everything here is good, spring is in full swing, the snow has not come down yet, but it seems to be coming off, there is a lot of cold on the road, and I barely tore off the gate - there was ice here like a pinch! So when I entered, I checked the pipes right away and realized that thank God, they are safe. Well, indeed - the winter was not very harsh more than twenty-two and it did not seem to be, but for us it is just grace - both the young apple trees and your roses, and again so that the pipes do not tear. But nothing, everything worked out, everything is fine here. Martin Alekseevich! I called Lyubana before leaving and she told me everything about how it was with you and Nikolai. This is of course very unpleasant. I have long said that Nikolai is a rude and rude man. I told her on the phone, but she calmed me down and said that everything was fine, that Nikolai apologized. I think all this is nothing and you never mind.
>>192731312>1. What if a child escapes?Try to find them, if their parents want it.>2. And then their parents are allowed to kill them right away?Why? For what? Who's here violating NAP?>3. What if you don’t agree on which court to use?Don't use it.>What if the court you finally chose makes an incompetent decision and enforces it?You have other courts in jurisdiction, and some guns (if you can find support from other people).>Does it violate NAP?What exactly?>Who decides?You and those to who you give rights to decides.
>>192731827The economy of UK is still great, no doubt, but one cannot simply ignore the whole situation with arabic and other kind of immigrants. It's still unfolding and wil become even worse over time. Is this sensible of you to grant the type of government a theoretical superiority against others? It wasn't able to fix this kind of problem and fellow englishmen are sufferring under those muslim & surges. As for Japan, they've gor a different socio-political situation all together.
>>192731760Male human has parted with a fraction of his wealth for the purpose of being in possession of a piece of heavily manufactured felt used to cover one's cranium from heat or precipitations. The said apparel fit above-mentioned individual perfectly.
>>192732248Yeah, you are flawlessly correct.But my point is that their government isn’t doing worse that it’s republican rivals so that is not the argument AGAINST monarchy.
>>1927320521. They are able to force the child to return? Why?2. You said children can violate NAP. Can their parents(or just random strangers) kill them for doing so?3. What if the offender doesn’t want to go to court at all?Do you force him or not?If you do, how is that not violating NAP?If you don’t, how do you deal with the problem?
>>192732547As I said in my original post here's only 1,5 anon discussing something. Maybe I should go with NOTCHNOY next time.
>>192732605>1. They are able to force the child to return? Why?If they fine parents, i think they do not need to use force to return their children.>Can their parents(or just random strangers) kill them for doing so?Can (like now in the all world), but they (parents) need to have some strong proofs to doing this (i think nobody don't believe to that parents). And this can be not in rule of jurisdiction.>Do you force him or not?Not if he/she doesn't violate NAP or don't violate rules of the jurisdiction.I know, my english is a shame. And i tiered use english. My brain is "boiling" now.
>>1927330651. Two year old escaped his home and accidentaly hit random man. Can random man now kill the child for violating the NAP?2. Who will punish the parents for killing their children for no reason? And how?3. Your English is okay, your logic is worse by a lot.Who decide what is the violation of NAP and what isn’t? The court?How can a court sentence a criminal to anything if using the court requires him agreeing? That makes no sense.
>>192733755>1. Two year old escaped his home and accidentaly hit random man. Can random man now kill the child for violating the NAP?Can, but with proofes. But i think reputation of this man will be destroyed. And he should be paranoied from probable vengeanceafter this.>2. Who will punish the parents for killing their children for no reason?Jurisdiction (with courts and private guards) or other people, if they have proofes.>Who decide what is the violation of NAP and what isn’t? The court?Yep, one of ways. >How can a court sentence a criminal to anything if using the court requires him agreeing? That makes no sense.If crimes violate agreement of other people, court have rights viollate agreement of crimes.
>>1927345621. So basically nothing stops people from killing children if they want to? Just trick the kid into hitting you and you are allowed to kill him?2. What if the criminal doesn’t want to go to court?How can you pick a court without agreeing with him about what court it should be?Can court he didn’t agree to obey enforce sentences on him? If so, why?3. Let’s say John kidnapped a person. There are no proofs but he is under high suspicion and it is obvious he did it. No one is allowed to enter John’s property without his consent so the victim has no chance of being freed unless court decides so.Court can’t decide anything because John never agreed to obey it.John wins a free slave?
>>192735493>1. So basically nothing stops people from killing children if they want to? Just trick the kid into hitting you and you are allowed to kill him?I think most of parents will protecting their children. And i not agree with killing children for simple hitting from them, from moral point of view. Most people too.>If so, why?Court can (if NAP violated) give order to private guards to use force.
>>1927359261. So what? Most of them, but not everyone. Your disagreement is not a suitable response for a child murder.2. How can the court decide anything if a criminal does not agree to obey it? Who gives the court it’s legitimacy besides both sides agreeing on that matter?
>>192736487>Your disagreement is not a suitable response for a child murder.If it murder (adult man) violated NAP to kid, he must be punished.>Who gives the court it’s legitimacy besides both sides agreeing on that matter?1. Members of jurisdiction.2. From people who's violated NAP, court don't need any agreement to pass sentence.
>>192737054Bro, it is far too late for me, won’t be able to reply anymore, so I just want to summarize it.1. It is often unclear if something violates NAP or not.2. The only way to decide is through court.3. Court can decide anything ONLY if both sides agreed to obey it’s decision before. Otherwise it has no legitimacy.You can’t just form a court of yourself, sentence random man to death and be allowed to kill him.He should agree to obey what the court says otherwise that court is unable to sentence him without violating the NAP.No matter what he did.TL;DR: Courts exist for the sole purpose of violating the NAP.Court based on agreement instead of enforcement is unable to punish anyone.
>>192728356I started to learn German around 1,5 yaers ago, in case i do it only by myself, and don't have much time to spend learning new lagnuage i probably still at A1.2-A1.1 lvlbtw, i didn't really learn english intentionally, so even my english is not so good as i want it to be
>>192748792>cockholesWha? These things are called urethras and I am quite sure they have no consciousness.But people who masturbate through putting things in there are perverts, that’s beyond doubt.
