Сап b/. Отношений тред. Ищу здесь совета,знаю,что наверное это не то место,где такое стоит спрашивать,но друзья говорят,что то невнятное и очевидное,а сам я не ебу,что делать с тем что происходит. В общем ситуация такая, почти два года с тян, всё вроде бы ок, но иногда у неё накатывало,это всегда было за время отношений,но в последнее время прямо жесть. Решил написать сюда после того как получил пикрил, там хуёвый месяц был, много рассказывать.Что вообще делать и как быть? Вообще до конца думал,что всё не так хуёво,но раз уж я начинаю постить на дваче, значит всё таки хуёво дело.
Bullshit (also bullshite or bullcrap) is a common English expletive which may be shortened to the euphemism bull or the initialism B.S. In British English, "bollocks" is a comparable expletive. It is mostly a slang term and a profanity which means "nonsense", especially as a rebuke in response to communication or actions viewed as deceptive, misleading, disingenuous, unfair or false. As with many expletives, the term can be used as an interjection, or as many other parts of speech, and can carry a wide variety of meanings. A person who communicates nonsense on a given subject may be referred to as a "bullshit artist".In philosophy and psychology of cognition the term "bullshit" is sometimes used to specifically refer to statements produced without particular concern of truth, to distinguish from a deliberate, manipulative lie intended to subvert the truth.[1] In business and management, guidance for comprehending, recognizing, acting on and preventing bullshit, are proposed for stifling the production and spread of this form of misrepresentation in the workplace, media and society.[2]While the word is generally used in a deprecatory sense, it may imply a measure of respect for language skills or frivolity, among various other benign usages. In philosophy, Harry Frankfurt, among others, analyzed the concept of bullshit as related to, but distinct from, lying.As an exclamation, "Bullshit!" conveys a measure of dissatisfaction with something or someone, but this usage need not be a comment on the truth of the matter.Contents1 Etymology2 In the philosophy of truth and rhetoric2.1 Assertions of fact2.2 Harry Frankfurt's concept2.3 David Graeber's theory of bullshit work in the modern economy3 In everyday language4 In popular culture5 See also6 References6.1 Notes6.2 Bibliography7 External linksEtymology"Bull", meaning nonsense, dates from the 17th century, while the term "bullshit" has been used as early as 1915 in British[3] and American[4] slang, and came into popular usage only during World War II. The word "bull" itself may have derived from the Old French bole meaning "fraud, deceit".[4] The term "horseshit" is a near synonym. An occasionally used South African English equivalent, though more common in Australian slang, is "bull dust".Although there is no confirmed etymological connection, these older meanings are synonymous with the modern expression "bull", generally considered and used as a contraction of "bullshit".Another proposal, according to the lexicographer Eric Partridge, is that the term was popularized by the Australian and New Zealand troops from about 1916 arriving at the front during World War I. Partridge claims that the British commanding officers placed emphasis on bull; that is, attention to appearances, even when it was a hindrance to waging war. The foreign Diggers allegedly ridiculed the British by calling it bullshit.[5]In George Orwell's Down and Out in Paris and London, Orwell writes that the insult bullshit stems from Bolshevik, and the association with communists is the source of the words insult.[6]In the philosophy of truth and rhetoricAssertions of fact"Bullshit" is commonly used to describe statements made by people more concerned with the response of the audience than in truth and accuracy, such as goal-oriented statements made in the field of politics or advertising. On one prominent occasion, the word itself was part of a controversial advertisement. During the 1980 U.S. presidential campaign, the Citizens Party candidate Barry Commoner ran a radio advertisement that began with an actor exclaiming: "Bullshit! Carter, Reagan and Anderson, it's all bullshit!" NBC refused to run the advertisement because of its use of the expletive, but Commoner's campaign successfully appealed to the Federal Communications Commission to allow the advertisement to run unedited.[7]Harry Frankfurt's conceptIn his essay On Bullshit (originally written in 1986, and published as a monograph in 2005), philosopher Harry Frankfurt of Princeton University characterizes bullshit as a form of falsehood distinct from lying. The liar, Frankfurt holds, knows and cares about the truth, but deliberately sets out to mislead instead of telling the truth. The "bullshitter", on the other hand, does not care about the truth and is only seeking to impress:[8]It is impossible for someone to lie unless he thinks he knows the truth. Producing bullshit requires no such conviction. A person who lies is thereby responding to the truth, and he is to that extent respectful of it. When an honest man speaks, he says only what he believes to be true; and for the liar, it is correspondingly indispensable that he considers his statements to be false. For the bullshitter, however, all these bets are off: he is neither on the side of the true nor on the side of the false. His eye is not on the facts at all, as the eyes of the honest man and of the liar are, except insofar as they may be pertinent to his interest in getting away with what he says. He does not care whether the things he says describe reality correctly. He just picks them out, or makes them up, to suit his purpose.Frankfurt connects this analysis of bullshit with Ludwig Wittgenstein's disdain of "non-sense" talk, and with the popular concept of a "bull session" in which speakers may try out unusual views without commitment. He fixes the blame for the prevalence of "bullshit" in modern society upon anti-realism and upon the growing frequency of situations in which people are expected to speak or have opinions without appropriate knowledge of the subject matter.Several political commentators have seen that Frankfurt's concept of bullshit provides insights into political campaigns.[9] Gerald Cohen, in "Deeper into Bullshit", contrasted the kind of "bullshit" Frankfurt describes with a different sort: nonsense discourse presented as sense. Cohen points out that this sort of bullshit can be produced either accidentally or deliberately. While some writers do deliberately produce bullshit, a person can also aim at sense and produce nonsense by mistake; or a person deceived by a piece of bullshit can repeat it innocently, without intent to deceive others.[10]Cohen gives the example of Alan Sokal's "Transgressing the Boundaries" as a piece of deliberate bullshit. Sokal's aim in creating it, however, was to show that the "postmodernist" editors who accepted his paper for publication could not distinguish nonsense from sense, and thereby by implication that their field was "bullshit".David Graeber's theory of bullshit work in the modern economyAnthropologist David Graeber's book Bullshit Jobs: A Theory argues the existence and societal harm of meaningless jobs. He contends that over half of societal work is pointless, which becomes psychologically destructive.
Был опыт с похожей особой, бросай её, она из тебя будет высасывать все соки ради своего маня эго и утопит тебя в болоте депрессии. Не надо тебе это все.
Bullshit (also bullshite or bullcrap) is a common English expletive which may be shortened to the euphemism bull or the initialism B.S. In British English, "bollocks" is a comparable expletive. It is mostly a slang term and a profanity which means "nonsense", especially as a rebuke in response to communication or actions viewed as deceptive, misleading, disingenuous, unfair or false. As with many expletives, the term can be used as an interjection, or as many other parts of speech, and can carry a wide variety of meanings. A person who communicates nonsense on a given subject may be referred to as a "bullshit artist".In philosophy and psychology of cognition the term "bullshit" is sometimes used to specifically refer to statements produced without particular concern of truth, to distinguish from a deliberate, manipulative lie intended to subvert the truth.[1] In business and management, guidance for comprehending, recognizing, acting on and preventing bullshit, are proposed for stifling the production and spread of this form of misrepresentation in the workplace, media and society.[2]While the word is generally used in a deprecatory sense, it may imply a measure of respect for language skills or frivolity, among various other benign usages. In philosophy, Harry Frankfurt, among others, analyzed the concept of bullshit as related to, but distinct from, lying.As an exclamation, "Bullshit!" conveys a measure of dissatisfaction with something or someone, but this usage need not be a comment on the truth of the matter.Contents1 Etymology2 In the philosophy of truth and rhetoric2.1 Assertions of fact2.2 Harry Frankfurt's concept2.3 David Graeber's theory of bullshit work in the modern economy3 In everyday language4 In popular culture5 See also6 References6.1 Notes6.2 Bibliography7 External linksEtymology"Bull", meaning nonsense, dates from the 17th century, while the term "bullshit" has been used as early as 1915 in British[3] and American[4] slang, and came into popular usage only during World War II. The word "bull" itself may have derived from the Old French bole meaning "fraud, deceit".[4] The term "horseshit" is a near synonym. An occasionally used South African English equivalent, though more common in Australian slang, is "bull dust".Although there is no confirmed etymological connection, these older meanings are synonymous with the modern expression "bull", generally considered and used as a contraction of "bullshit".Another proposal, according to the lexicographer Eric Partridge, is that the term was popularized by the Australian and New Zealand troops from about 1916 arriving at the front during World War I. Partridge claims that the British commanding officers placed emphasis on bull; that is, attention to appearances, even when it was a hindrance to waging war. The foreign Diggers allegedly ridiculed the British by calling it bullshit.[5]In George Orwell's Down and Out in Paris and London, Orwell writes that the insult bullshit stems from Bolshevik, and the association with communists is the source of the words insult.[6]In the philosophy of truth and rhetoricAssertions of fact"Bullshit" is commonly used to describe statements made by people more concerned with the response of the audience than in truth and accuracy, such as goal-oriented statements made in the field of politics or advertising. On one prominent occasion, the word itself was part of a controversial advertisement. During the 1980 U.S. presidential campaign, the Citizens Party candidate Barry Commoner ran a radio advertisement that began with an actor exclaiming: "Bullshit! Carter, Reagan and Anderson, it's all bullshit!" NBC refused to run the advertisement because of its use of the expletive, but Commoner's campaign successfully appealed to the Federal Communications Commission to allow the advertisement to run unedited.[7]Harry Frankfurt's conceptIn his essay On Bullshit (originally written in 1986, and published as a monograph in 2005), philosopher Harry Frankfurt of Princeton University characterizes bullshit as a form of falsehood distinct from lying. The liar, Frankfurt holds, knows and cares about the truth, but deliberately sets out to mislead instead of telling the truth. The "bullshitter", on the other hand, does not care about the truth and is only seeking to impress:[8]It is impossible for someone to lie unless he thinks he knows the truth. Producing bullshit requires no such conviction. A person who lies is thereby responding to the truth, and he is to that extent respectful of it. When an honest man speaks, he says only what he believes to be true; and for the liar, it is correspondingly indispensable that he considers his statements to be false. For the bullshitter, however, all these bets are off: he is neither on the side of the true nor on the side of the false. His eye is not on the facts at all, as the eyes of the honest man and of the liar are, except insofar as they may be pertinent to his interest in getting away with what he says. He does not care whether the things he says describe reality correctly. He just picks them out, or makes them up, to suit his purpose.Frankfurt connects this analysis of bullshit with Ludwig Wittgenstein's disdain of "non-sense" talk, and with the popular concept of a "bull session" in which speakers may try out unusual views without commitment. He fixes the blame for the prevalence of "bullshit" in modern society upon anti-realism and upon the growing frequency of situations in which people are expected to speak or have opinions without appropriate knowledge of the subject matter.Several political commentators have seen that Frankfurt's concept of bullshit provides insights into political campaigns.[9] Gerald Cohen, in "Deeper into Bullshit", contrasted the kind of "bullshit" Frankfurt describes with a different sort: nonsense discourse presented as sense. Cohen points out that this sort of bullshit can be produced either accidentally or deliberately. While some writers do deliberately produce bullshit, a person can also aim at sense and produce nonsense by mistake; or a person deceived by a piece of bullshit can repeat it innocently, without intent to deceive others.[10]Cohen gives the example of Alan Sokal's "Transgressing the Boundaries" as a piece of deliberate bullshit. Sokal's aim in creating it, however, was to show that the "postmodernist" editors who accepted his paper for publication could not distinguish nonsense from sense, and thereby by implication that their field was "bullshit".David Graeber's theory of bullshit work in the modern economyAnthropologist David Graeber's book Bullshit Jobs: A Theory argues the existence and societal harm of meaningless jobs. He contends that over half of societal work is pointless, which becomes psychologically destructive.
Она от тебя съебет и будет счастлива с тупым быдланом, а ты потом будешь создавать пиздострадальческие треды.
Bullshit (also bullshite or bullcrap) is a common English expletive which may be shortened to the euphemism bull or the initialism B.S. In British English, "bollocks" is a comparable expletive. It is mostly a slang term and a profanity which means "nonsense", especially as a rebuke in response to communication or actions viewed as deceptive, misleading, disingenuous, unfair or false. As with many expletives, the term can be used as an interjection, or as many other parts of speech, and can carry a wide variety of meanings. A person who communicates nonsense on a given subject may be referred to as a "bullshit artist".In philosophy and psychology of cognition the term "bullshit" is sometimes used to specifically refer to statements produced without particular concern of truth, to distinguish from a deliberate, manipulative lie intended to subvert the truth.[1] In business and management, guidance for comprehending, recognizing, acting on and preventing bullshit, are proposed for stifling the production and spread of this form of misrepresentation in the workplace, media and society.[2]While the word is generally used in a deprecatory sense, it may imply a measure of respect for language skills or frivolity, among various other benign usages. In philosophy, Harry Frankfurt, among others, analyzed the concept of bullshit as related to, but distinct from, lying.As an exclamation, "Bullshit!" conveys a measure of dissatisfaction with something or someone, but this usage need not be a comment on the truth of the matter.Contents1 Etymology2 In the philosophy of truth and rhetoric2.1 Assertions of fact2.2 Harry Frankfurt's concept2.3 David Graeber's theory of bullshit work in the modern economy3 In everyday language4 In popular culture5 See also6 References6.1 Notes6.2 Bibliography7 External linksEtymology"Bull", meaning nonsense, dates from the 17th century, while the term "bullshit" has been used as early as 1915 in British[3] and American[4] slang, and came into popular usage only during World War II. The word "bull" itself may have derived from the Old French bole meaning "fraud, deceit".[4] The term "horseshit" is a near synonym. An occasionally used South African English equivalent, though more common in Australian slang, is "bull dust".Although there is no confirmed etymological connection, these older meanings are synonymous with the modern expression "bull", generally considered and used as a contraction of "bullshit".Another proposal, according to the lexicographer Eric Partridge, is that the term was popularized by the Australian and New Zealand troops from about 1916 arriving at the front during World War I. Partridge claims that the British commanding officers placed emphasis on bull; that is, attention to appearances, even when it was a hindrance to waging war. The foreign Diggers allegedly ridiculed the British by calling it bullshit.[5]In George Orwell's Down and Out in Paris and London, Orwell writes that the insult bullshit stems from Bolshevik, and the association with communists is the source of the words insult.[6]In the philosophy of truth and rhetoricAssertions of fact"Bullshit" is commonly used to describe statements made by people more concerned with the response of the audience than in truth and accuracy, such as goal-oriented statements made in the field of politics or advertising. On one prominent occasion, the word itself was part of a controversial advertisement. During the 1980 U.S. presidential campaign, the Citizens Party candidate Barry Commoner ran a radio advertisement that began with an actor exclaiming: "Bullshit! Carter, Reagan and Anderson, it's all bullshit!" NBC refused to run the advertisement because of its use of the expletive, but Commoner's campaign successfully appealed to the Federal Communications Commission to allow the advertisement to run unedited.[7]Harry Frankfurt's conceptIn his essay On Bullshit (originally written in 1986, and published as a monograph in 2005), philosopher Harry Frankfurt of Princeton University characterizes bullshit as a form of falsehood distinct from lying. The liar, Frankfurt holds, knows and cares about the truth, but deliberately sets out to mislead instead of telling the truth. The "bullshitter", on the other hand, does not care about the truth and is only seeking to impress:[8]It is impossible for someone to lie unless he thinks he knows the truth. Producing bullshit requires no such conviction. A person who lies is thereby responding to the truth, and he is to that extent respectful of it. When an honest man speaks, he says only what he believes to be true; and for the liar, it is correspondingly indispensable that he considers his statements to be false. For the bullshitter, however, all these bets are off: he is neither on the side of the true nor on the side of the false. His eye is not on the facts at all, as the eyes of the honest man and of the liar are, except insofar as they may be pertinent to his interest in getting away with what he says. He does not care whether the things he says describe reality correctly. He just picks them out, or makes them up, to suit his purpose.Frankfurt connects this analysis of bullshit with Ludwig Wittgenstein's disdain of "non-sense" talk, and with the popular concept of a "bull session" in which speakers may try out unusual views without commitment. He fixes the blame for the prevalence of "bullshit" in modern society upon anti-realism and upon the growing frequency of situations in which people are expected to speak or have opinions without appropriate knowledge of the subject matter.Several political commentators have seen that Frankfurt's concept of bullshit provides insights into political campaigns.[9] Gerald Cohen, in "Deeper into Bullshit", contrasted the kind of "bullshit" Frankfurt describes with a different sort: nonsense discourse presented as sense. Cohen points out that this sort of bullshit can be produced either accidentally or deliberately. While some writers do deliberately produce bullshit, a person can also aim at sense and produce nonsense by mistake; or a person deceived by a piece of bullshit can repeat it innocently, without intent to deceive others.[10]Cohen gives the example of Alan Sokal's "Transgressing the Boundaries" as a piece of deliberate bullshit. Sokal's aim in creating it, however, was to show that the "postmodernist" editors who accepted his paper for publication could not distinguish nonsense from sense, and thereby by implication that their field was "bullshit".David Graeber's theory of bullshit work in the modern economyAnthropologist David Graeber's book Bullshit Jobs: A Theory argues the existence and societal harm of meaningless jobs. He contends that over half of societal work is pointless, which becomes psychologically destructive.
ullshit (also bullshite or bullcrap) is a common English expletive which may be shortened to the euphemism bull or the initialism B.S. In British English, "bollocks" is a comparable expletive. It is mostly a slang term and a profanity which means "nonsense", especially as a rebuke in response to communication or actions viewed as deceptive, misleading, disingenuous, unfair or false. As with many expletives, the term can be used as an interjection, or as many other parts of speech, and can carry a wide variety of meanings. A person who communicates nonsense on a given subject may be referred to as a "bullshit artist".In philosophy and psychology of cognition the term "bullshit" is sometimes used to specifically refer to statements produced without particular concern of truth, to distinguish from a deliberate, manipulative lie intended to subvert the truth.[1] In business and management, guidance for comprehending, recognizing, acting on and preventing bullshit, are proposed for stifling the production and spread of this form of misrepresentation in the workplace, media and society.[2]While the word is generally used in a deprecatory sense, it may imply a measure of respect for language skills or frivolity, among various other benign usages. In philosophy, Harry Frankfurt, among others, analyzed the concept of bullshit as related to, but distinct from, lying.As an exclamation, "Bullshit!" conveys a measure of dissatisfaction with something or someone, but this usage need not be a comment on the truth of the matter.Contents1 Etymology2 In the philosophy of truth and rhetoric2.1 Assertions of fact2.2 Harry Frankfurt's concept2.3 David Graeber's theory of bullshit work in the modern economy3 In everyday language4 In popular culture5 See also6 References6.1 Notes6.2 Bibliography7 External linksEtymology"Bull", meaning nonsense, dates from the 17th century, while the term "bullshit" has been used as early as 1915 in British[3] and American[4] slang, and came into popular usage only during World War II. The word "bull" itself may have derived from the Old French bole meaning "fraud, deceit".[4] The term "horseshit" is a near synonym. An occasionally used South African English equivalent, though more common in Australian slang, is "bull dust".Although there is no confirmed etymological connection, these older meanings are synonymous with the modern expression "bull", generally considered and used as a contraction of "bullshit".Another proposal, according to the lexicographer Eric Partridge, is that the term was popularized by the Australian and New Zealand troops from about 1916 arriving at the front during World War I. Partridge claims that the British commanding officers placed emphasis on bull; that is, attention to appearances, even when it was a hindrance to waging war. The foreign Diggers allegedly ridiculed the British by calling it bullshit.[5]In George Orwell's Down and Out in Paris and London, Orwell writes that the insult bullshit stems from Bolshevik, and the association with communists is the source of the words insult.[6]In the philosophy of truth and rhetoricAssertions of fact"Bullshit" is commonly used to describe statements made by people more concerned with the response of the audience than in truth and accuracy, such as goal-oriented statements made in the field of politics or advertising. On one prominent occasion, the word itself was part of a controversial advertisement. During the 1980 U.S. presidential campaign, the Citizens Party candidate Barry Commoner ran a radio advertisement that began with an actor exclaiming: "Bullshit! Carter, Reagan and Anderson, it's all bullshit!" NBC refused to run the advertisement because of its use of the expletive, but Commoner's campaign successfully appealed to the Federal Communications Commission to allow the advertisement to run unedited.[7]Harry Frankfurt's conceptIn his essay On Bullshit (originally written in 1986, and published as a monograph in 2005), philosopher Harry Frankfurt of Princeton University characterizes bullshit as a form of falsehood distinct from lying. The liar, Frankfurt holds, knows and cares about the truth, but deliberately sets out to mislead instead of telling the truth. The "bullshitter", on the other hand, does not care about the truth and is only seeking to impress:[8]It is impossible for someone to lie unless he thinks he knows the truth. Producing bullshit requires no such conviction. A person who lies is thereby responding to the truth, and he is to that extent respectful of it. When an honest man speaks, he says only what he believes to be true; and for the liar, it is correspondingly indispensable that he considers his statements to be false. For the bullshitter, however, all these bets are off: he is neither on the side of the true nor on the side of the false. His eye is not on the facts at all, as the eyes of the honest man and of the liar are, except insofar as they may be pertinent to his interest in getting away with what he says. He does not care whether the things he says describe reality correctly. He just picks them out, or makes them up, to suit his purpose.Frankfurt connects this analysis of bullshit with Ludwig Wittgenstein's disdain of "non-sense" talk, and with the popular concept of a "bull session" in which speakers may try out unusual views without commitment. He fixes the blame for the prevalence of "bullshit" in modern society upon anti-realism and upon the growing frequency of situations in which people are expected to speak or have opinions without appropriate knowledge of the subject matter.Several political commentators have seen that Frankfurt's concept of bullshit provides insights into political campaigns.[9] Gerald Cohen, in "Deeper into Bullshit", contrasted the kind of "bullshit" Frankfurt describes with a different sort: nonsense discourse presented as sense. Cohen points out that this sort of bullshit can be produced either accidentally or deliberately. While some writers do deliberately produce bullshit, a person can also aim at sense and produce nonsense by mistake; or a person deceived by a piece of bullshit can repeat it innocently, without intent to deceive others.[10]Cohen gives the example of Alan Sokal's "Transgressing the Boundaries" as a piece of deliberate bullshit. Sokal's aim in creating it, however, was to show that the "postmodernist" editors who accepted his paper for publication could not distinguish nonsense from sense, and thereby by implication that their field was "bullshit".David Graeber's theory of bullshit work in the modern economyAnthropologist David Graeber's book Bullshit Jobs: A Theory argues the existence and societal harm of meaningless jobs. He contends that over half of societal work is pointless, which becomes psychologically destructive.
ullshit (also bullshite or bullcrap) is a common English expletive which may be shortened to the euphemism bull or the initialism B.S. In British English, "bollocks" is a comparable expletive. It is mostly a slang term and a profanity which means "nonsense", especially as a rebuke in response to communication or actions viewed as deceptive, misleading, disingenuous, unfair or false. As with many expletives, the term can be used as an interjection, or as many other parts of speech, and can carry a wide variety of meanings. A person who communicates nonsense on a given subject may be referred to as a "bullshit artist".In philosophy and psychology of cognition the term "bullshit" is sometimes used to specifically refer to statements produced without particular concern of truth, to distinguish from a deliberate, manipulative lie intended to subvert the truth.[1] In business and management, guidance for comprehending, recognizing, acting on and preventing bullshit, are proposed for stifling the production and spread of this form of misrepresentation in the workplace, media and society.[2]While the word is generally used in a deprecatory sense, it may imply a measure of respect for language skills or frivolity, among various other benign usages. In philosophy, Harry Frankfurt, among others, analyzed the concept of bullshit as related to, but distinct from, lying.As an exclamation, "Bullshit!" conveys a measure of dissatisfaction with something or someone, but this usage need not be a comment on the truth of the matter.Contents1 Etymology2 In the philosophy of truth and rhetoric2.1 Assertions of fact2.2 Harry Frankfurt's concept2.3 David Graeber's theory of bullshit work in the modern economy3 In everyday language4 In popular culture5 See also6 References6.1 Notes6.2 Bibliography7 External linksEtymology"Bull", meaning nonsense, dates from the 17th century, while the term "bullshit" has been used as early as 1915 in British[3] and American[4] slang, and came into popular usage only during World War II. The word "bull" itself may have derived from the Old French bole meaning "fraud, deceit".[4] The term "horseshit" is a near synonym. An occasionally used South African English equivalent, though more common in Australian slang, is "bull dust".Although there is no confirmed etymological connection, these older meanings are synonymous with the modern expression "bull", generally considered and used as a contraction of "bullshit".Another proposal, according to the lexicographer Eric Partridge, is that the term was popularized by the Australian and New Zealand troops from about 1916 arriving at the front during World War I. Partridge claims that the British commanding officers placed emphasis on bull; that is, attention to appearances, even when it was a hindrance to waging war. The foreign Diggers allegedly ridiculed the British by calling it bullshit.[5]In George Orwell's Down and Out in Paris and London, Orwell writes that the insult bullshit stems from Bolshevik, and the association with communists is the source of the words insult.[6]In the philosophy of truth and rhetoricAssertions of fact"Bullshit" is commonly used to describe statements made by people more concerned with the response of the audience than in truth and accuracy, such as goal-oriented statements made in the field of politics or advertising. On one prominent occasion, the word itself was part of a controversial advertisement. During the 1980 U.S. presidential campaign, the Citizens Party candidate Barry Commoner ran a radio advertisement that began with an actor exclaiming: "Bullshit! Carter, Reagan and Anderson, it's all bullshit!" NBC refused to run the advertisement because of its use of the expletive, but Commoner's campaign successfully appealed to the Federal Communications Commission to allow the advertisement to run unedited.[7]Harry Frankfurt's conceptIn his essay On Bullshit (originally written in 1986, and published as a monograph in 2005), philosopher Harry Frankfurt of Princeton University characterizes bullshit as a form of falsehood distinct from lying. The liar, Frankfurt holds, knows and cares about the truth, but deliberately sets out to mislead instead of telling the truth. The "bullshitter", on the other hand, does not care about the truth and is only seeking to impress:[8]It is impossible for someone to lie unless he thinks he knows the truth. Producing bullshit requires no such conviction. A person who lies is thereby responding to the truth, and he is to that extent respectful of it. When an honest man speaks, he says only what he believes to be true; and for the liar, it is correspondingly indispensable that he considers his statements to be false. For the bullshitter, however, all these bets are off: he is neither on the side of the true nor on the side of the false. His eye is not on the facts at all, as the eyes of the honest man and of the liar are, except insofar as they may be pertinent to his interest in getting away with what he says. He does not care whether the things he says describe reality correctly. He just picks them out, or makes them up, to suit his purpose.Frankfurt connects this analysis of bullshit with Ludwig Wittgenstein's disdain of "non-sense" talk, and with the popular concept of a "bull session" in which speakers may try out unusual views without commitment. He fixes the blame for the prevalence of "bullshit" in modern society upon anti-realism and upon the growing frequency of situations in which people are expected to speak or have opinions without appropriate knowledge of the subject matter.Several political commentators have seen that Frankfurt's concept of bullshit provides insights into political campaigns.[9] Gerald Cohen, in "Deeper into Bullshit", contrasted the kind of "bullshit" Frankfurt describes with a different sort: nonsense discourse presented as sense. Cohen points out that this sort of bullshit can be produced either accidentally or deliberately. While some writers do deliberately produce bullshit, a person can also aim at sense and produce nonsense by mistake; or a person deceived by a piece of bullshit can repeat it innocently, without intent to deceive others.[10]Cohen gives the example of Alan Sokal's "Transgressing the Boundaries" as a piece of deliberate bullshit. Sokal's aim in creating it, however, was to show that the "postmodernist" editors who accepted his paper for publication could not distinguish nonsense from sense, and thereby by implication that their field was "bullshit".David Graeber's theory of bullshit work in the modern economyAnthropologist David Graeber's book Bullshit Jobs: A Theory argues the existence and societal harm of meaningless jobs. He contends that over half of societal work is pointless, which becomes psychologically destructive.
Анончик, миленький, тяжёлого человека для отношений ты себе выбрал. Но если любишь и готов превозмогать, чтобы побороть такие вот приступы, тебе придётся вложить много сил и времени. Во-первых, если она так сильно загоняется по своей жалкости, ты можешь сам найти ей занятие, потихоньку убедить, что она делает в этом успехи, что у всех бывают ошибки и трудные времена, и т.п.Ты должен будешь говорить ей, что любишь её не за то, какая у неё работа или учёба, или что она умеет делать, а за то, как тебе нравится проводить время с ней. Как ты любишь гладить её волосы, целовать, - что другую такую, если она исчезнет, ты уже не найдёшь. Что будешь просыпаться с другим человеком и не чувствовать счастья. Что твой источник счастья - это то, что она с тобой.Тащить самооценку человека и убеждать его в своей значимости - тяжёлый труд, но если справишься и сделаешь всё правильно, когда самооценочка нормализуется, человек сам начнёт искать себе занятия и понимать мир вокруг. Главное не проебать момент и не воспитать ЧСВ суку.Удачи тебе!
>>226120493Ну ебать. А что делать. Либо работать над этим дерьмом, либо дропать и искать другое дерьмо. Хрен редьки не слаще.
ну, скорее всего если ты ее бросишь то она сама наложит на себя руки раз так ей хуевоя бы посмоветовал сходить в психологу ей, потому что судя по всему у нее очень низкая самооценка и все в таком духе, ей тяжело, я понимаю её просто она не видит что ты ее любишь такой какая она есть, очень не уверена в себе поэтому боитсяскорее всего она в окружении более красивых девок, я бы запретил бы ей вообще во всчкие инстаграмы заходить и т.д. где более успешные шлюхи показывают свои ненастоящие жизнина деле если она тебе правда дорога то это будет скорее всего долго, но если ты готов то она будет думаю благодарна тебе за то что ты помог ейну на деле тебе решать че делать, анонпросто если ты ее как бы воспитаешь то врятли она уйдет от тебяесли конечно она сама не шлюха которая только ноет это давно? точнее так было всегда? она проявляла хоть какую то радость? а с детством что? это всё очень влияет
>>226120266Прожили полтора года, вместе переехали в другой город, я устраиваюсь на работу в то время как она свою лень прикрывает "Депрессией", когда я работал эта особа за мои деньги развлекалась дома смотря манимэ, пья сидры, куря мои блоки сиг и гуляя с какими-то друзьями. Последней каплей стало когда она начала избивать мою кошку за то что та царапнула её. В итоге съебал обратно к себе Усральск, а эта хуета осталась там, сейчас хз что с ней, да и похуй.Сейчас более менее так как здесь друзья, да и девушку новую нашел.
Была такая тян, встречались 3 года, по итогу после долгого времени подобной мозгоебли разошлись очень плохо, мне кажется таким людям пиздострадания в кайф, в целом если тебе ок и ты готов подыгрывать этому дерьму, то оставляй, ежели читаешь подобное и улыбаешься с того как это все несущественно - дропайпривет, я присяду? хочу ли я себя убить? ну да а как ты узнал?
>>226120702Когда ирл вместе, 90% процентов времени у неё всё ок, только когда я её провожаю,снова нчинается. Обычно всё происходит,когда в телеге общаемся, порой,я вообще логику не понимаю. Например пикрил в шапке ситуация была пиздецовая,по крайней мере для тебя
>>226120976А как у тебя сил хватило дропнуть,я ещё с начала отношений понял во что ввязался,у меня тупо не хватит сил её дропнуть,потому что человека будет жалко, мне кажется она такого точно не заслужила. Но всё чаще кажется,что ей от отношений ещё хуёвей,чем вне их,правда мне кажется, что вряд ли получится,остаться хотя бы друзьями, я себя замучаю,если дропну. Но да люблю её один хуй
>>226119796 (OP)О ебать, это ж моя бывшая. Вот так достанешь человека тян со дна, а она потом тебя нахуй шлёт. И тебе такое предстоит. Удачи, чел.
>>226120702Вообще,на самом деле мы супер разные в плане социальности,у неё буквально нет друзей, я пытался, её пнуть в сторону друзей,или что то такое,но было только хуже,срались,купил ей графический планшет,чтобы она занималась рисованием,купил ей укулеле,чтобы она что то делала,всё забрасывает,если и берётся то не на долго,и сидит в соц сетях. Заставлять я её не могу. Я же наоборот,дохуя друзей,постоянно где то пропадаю,не люблю много времени торчать в социалках,знаю что мне надо и занимаюсь этим всем или иду к этому. И когда она мне говорит,что ничтожность,и нихуя не может делать,я просто этого не понимаю,потому что проецирую себя,хотя это вероятно неправильно
>>226121637Часто наши вот эти срачи,даже наверное не срачи,а просто,когда она начинает,про то какая она никчёмная,заканчиваются словами,с её стороны дропай меня,с моей дропай меня, и я знаю,что ни она ни я,не сможет,по крайней мере сейчас
>>226121375Сначала все у нас было идеально, дропать никто никого не собирался, я бы и не смог по той же причине что привязался, но когда начались проблемы, начали ссориться и там уже дропнуть было проще, пару раз на эмоциях послал её, но она возвращалась, хотя я на ее глазах с другими гулял, лол. Потом постепенно она уже поостыла, расходились на какое то время, потом сходились, ну и концом стало то что я переехал в другой город, она один раз приехала ко мне, все было ок, но после ее отъезда снова посрались и я погнал ебать какую то рандомтян с тиндера, оказалось что у моей был доступ ко всем моим аккаунтам, собственно все спалила, послала меня нахуй и отправилась к давнему "другу" который её хз сколько добивался) Я пару месяцев попиздострадал, потом забил, через полгода нашел классуню тян, осознаю что был дэбилом, а так все круто.
>>226121892Да это все до поры до времени. Она же малолетка, верно? Потом пройдет это самобичевание. Но в этом ничего хорошего не будет, к сожалению.
>>226120702Вообще я не психолог и не воспитатель,я не копался во всём,она не о чём не жаловалась,я бы даже напротив сказал,что детство нормальное, родители нормальные,семья полная,в детстве наоборот был общительной. Вообще в этом плане я не ебу,твердолобый наверное
>>226121905В последнее время часто думаю,что скоро произойдёт,что то подобное, доучусь пойду по карьере, и у меня не будет времени,совсем уделять ей столько времени,сколько ей нужно, и я даже незнаю что тогда будет
>>226119796 (OP)Была у меня такая тян, в каком-то смысле до сих пор есть. Не пробовали антидепрессанты, помощь врачей? Это все они себе сами в голову вбивают. В целом, оно лечится зачастую без медикаментов, но с ними будет быстрее. Твоя задача просто быть для нее опорой, это довольно сложно объяснить, но будь рядом в обоих смыслах и старайся рационально фиксить каждый скандал.
>>226122491В мухосрани где живём,нет нормальных врачей,а антидеприсанты пробовали,только пасифлору и валерьянку ежедневно, и вроде бы они даже помогали,но в какой то момент,она отказалась принимать их со словами: "Не могу думать о том что ты тратишь на меня бабки"
>>226122938что то как то,тухло аноны отвечают,расскажи что у тебя,может я тебе что посоветую,хотя моя ситуация говорит о том,что мои советы лучше не слушать
>>226122684В интернете ищи, сеанс по скайпу не хуже обычного (учоные докозали, что скайп даже эффективнее), и рецепты тоже спокойно высылаются по почте.
>>226122684Тратить деньги на любимого человека это нормально. Я думаю, даже она это поймет, если ей так сказать. То, что ты перечислил это ерунда. Но раз говоришь, что помогали, то, возможно, и ады не понадобятся. Все равно советую с врачём проконсультироваться. У вас должны быть райцентры, где такие врачи есть.>>226122722Если правильно помню, мы пили миртазапин. Но он по рецепту, так что ещё один повод обратиться к врачам.
>>226121643Мне кажется что проблема как раз в том что вы разные (+ ее ментальные болячки). Возможно и она была бы такой, но что-то ей мешает (воспитание, психика, какие-то травмы и тд). В итоге она смотрит на тебя всего успешного по ее мнению и по сравнению с ней и загоняется ещё больше. Мне кажется, что на таком этапе может помочь только психиатр/психолог, который поставит диагноз (если он есть) и поможет (если нужно). Некоторые проблемы нельзя решить просто поговорив, так что скажи ей что ты готов вместе с ней решить те проблемы которые у нее есть и что будешь рядом в этот момент и пиздуйте лечить ей башку, это лучшее что ты сможешь сделать. А если она начнет явно выебываться и отказываться то можешь считать ее ленивой пиздаболкой без интересов и надежд, которую можно смело дропать как можно скорее
>>226123056Ну смотриМоя тня любит меня очень сильно, прям сильнее себя. Она тоже постоянно загоняется про то какая она хуевая и жалкая, а еще сука как назло у нее хуевая удача. Любой мой упрек в ее сторону воспринимает как предложение ее дропнуть. Я ее очень люблю, но вот эта ее хуйня меня истощает, и я понимаю, что ее можно же исправить как-то. Мама моя ее не одобряет ПАТАМУШТА ОНА НЕ ТВОЕЙ НАЦЫЫ. Встречаемся уже полгода, планируем совместный перекат. Просто хочу ее исправить, ради ее же блага.
>>226123713Отвечай "Могу" и смотри на реакцию. А вообще любовь делом доказывается и обычно одного раза достаточно, чтобы тян поняла. Возможно, ты сейчас на пути к этому разу.
>>226123738Еще у нас мало пересекающихся интересов (у обоих с этим беда лол две омежки), она старается в игры играть и что-то делать со мной вместе, но у нее беда с инетом и из-за этого еще сильнее загоняется, пзидец
>>226123887Того что она просто так ноет(про внешку, хотя она красивая по моему, про жизнь, хотя она тня лол) и пилит меня (думает то что у меня там шлюхи вк ебырь террорист гигачад).
>>226123887я предполагаю,он имеет ввиду,что то по факту,типа получила хуйню,нужно сделать то то,чтобы больше такого не было. Такая же залупа,у меня вот например,она ещё себе планки ставит ебанутые. Тип 99999 баллов за 3 экзамена,я на неё смотрю и хуею,потому что знаю,что у неё не выйдет, и она сама знает, и знает что ей пизда будет когда она увидит не 100
>>226119796 (OP)Отправляй её к психологу срочно. Тут нужно работать с мыслями, никакие антидепрессанты, скорее всего, не помогут. Прослеживается четкое "Я недостойна", это похоже на то, что есть у многих, кто не вступает в отношения "Я пока не достоин/-йна, мне нужно сначала ддостигнуть того-то и того-то, а пока я не имею права на отношения" и прочая хуйня. Тут, мне кажется, нужна КПТ для работы с мыслями.Но дело твое, ОП
>>226124039Ревность надо пресекать, потом похаваешь от этого, станет больше пиздеть об этом,ревновать о того что дунул сторону другой пизды,хз как фиксить, удалить вк например,всё равно залупа.
>>226124551Друзья звонят на телефон,или в телеге пишут. Рили. Можешь ей дать акк свой в вк,хотя скорее всего,у тебя там хуйни много всякой,что ей лучше не видеть
>>226124162>>226123738Для того чтобы исправить тню или хоть как-то на нее повлиять в большинстве случаев нужно показать, что ты это можешь сделать. На твоём месте я бы просто включал мод альфа самца и начал действовать конкретно. Хуевый интернет? - проведи ей нормальный, покажи что ты тот кто способен решать проблемы и кто действительно знает как ей будет лучше. Твоя реакция на ее нытье нормальная, просто нужно чтобы твое "хватит ныть, ты и так знаешь что я считаю тебя красивой/пиздатой/качество-нейм" было весомым. Часто всегда тни таким образом просто компенсируют недостаток комплиментов в реальной жизни, так что ее поведение естественно в случае если ты сам редко говоришь ей какие-то приятные вещи. Если же внимания с твоей стороны в этом плане хватает, то да, говори ей чтобы не выебывалась и что ее нытье не лучший способ для получения комплиментов с твоей стороны и ты сам справишься ну и справляйся блятьАлсо по поводу решения ее проблем: не преврати это в бездумное исполнения ее хотелок, которые прикрываются под видом "блин у меня такая хуевая юбочка я себя так ненавижу из-за того что хожу в ней, а других у меня нет....." пример тупой, но ты понял с намеком на соответствующие действия с твоей стороны
>>226124984Кстати так и сделаю с инетом, как приеду в город к ней. У нее роутер в начале квартиры, а ее комната с пекой в конце.Вопрос чем лучше решить? Провести длинный LAN кабель, или как-то выебнутся с антеннами?
>>226125390Интернет может быть хуевым по разным причинам: от низкой скорости со стороны провайдера до хуевой сетевой карты в ее ноуте. Скорее всего проложить кабель от роутера будет достаточно, а там уже смотри сам
>>226119796 (OP)Бросай, если жизнь дорога, это пиздец и тут ничего не сделать. Ты не исправишь её, не спасёшь, лучше беги и спасай свою жопу.
>>226124114О, тоже своей говорил так пару раз и тоже обижалась. Но я ей объяснил, что ей же так лучше, вроде поняла.
>>226132977У меня было похожее. Но там был паренек, я ему написал в инсту, он откликнулся, я его пидрилой назвал, он взбугуртил, назначил стрелку на петровско-разумовской, я пришел и наебошил ему. После этого тянка мне написала так будто бы РЕЗКО В СЕБЕ РАЗОБРАЛАСЬ, лол.Как у этих парней забивающих стрелки не хватает ума у тянки спросить что я такое прежде чем соглашаться?
>>226132977Норм, по классике я плохая ты хороший, ещё и похвалила себя что не будет френдзонить и держать аэродромом. Ничего не отвечай и не пиши больше я не смог и писал и было только хуже
Она нашла другой более привлекательный хуец. Возможно влюбилась в кого-то (не в тебя). Кароче забей на неё, не ищи скрытых смыслов тут. Ей просто впадлу назвать вещи своими именами и сказать как есть: Я ВЛЮБИЛАСЬ В ЕРОХУ СОРИ, ну потому что думает что это типо как "предательство", не понимает в силу возраста малого что нихуя тебе не должна. Распространённая проблема и не только среди баба, кстати. Просто ищи другую тян и не заёбывай. /тред