Vichan is the most popular and widely used imageboard software in the world. It is a free, light-weight, fast, highly configurable and user-friendly imageboard software package. Vichan is the most popular and widely used imageboard software in the world. It is a free, light-weight, fast, highly configurable and user-friendly imageboard software package. Vichan is the most popular and widely used imageboard software in the world. It is a free, light-weight, fast, highly configurable and user-friendly imageboard software package. Vichan is the most popular and widely used imageboard software in the world. It is a free, light-weight, fast, highly configurable and user-friendly imageboard software package. Vichan is the most popular and widely used imageboard software in the world. It is a free, light-weight, fast, highly configurable and user-friendly imageboard software package. Vichan is the most popular and widely used imageboard software in the world. It is a free, light-weight, fast, highly configurable and user-friendly imageboard software package. Vichan is the most popular and widely used imageboard software in the world. It is a free, light-weight, fast, highly configurable and user-friendly imageboard software package. Vichan is the most popular and widely used imageboard software in the world. It is a free, light-weight, fast, highly configurable and user-friendly imageboard software package.
С 2019-го есть две версии: в мастерской Стима от энтузиастов (Lost Alpha) и авторская от 7дл-куна. Новичку начинать со стимовской Лост Альфы, именно её обсуждают в треде.
Quick post I wanted to do because a lot of people know I refer to the E12 (and now, E16) as quad-core in comparison to other products: WD's tri-core NVMe controller, Samsung's penta-core, and especially SMI's dual-core SM2262/EN. This controller is how the E12 drives had fast sequential writes (SLC) and especially high IOPs ratings. SSD controllers are, generally, based on ARM designs, specifically [Cortex-R5](https://developer.arm.com/ip-products/processors/cortex-r/cortex-r5). This is chosen because the R5 is focused on high priority and low latency which are tenets of solid state, among other things.
Anyway, there's two elements I would like to briefly discuss here: first, the E12's design, and second, why it's unfair to compare simply on core count. In the first case, the E12 is actually a dual-core ARM design, so why do I refer to it as "quad-core?" Because Phison uses coprocessors (known as "CoXProcessor 2.0 technology") which is the secret to the sequential writes and high IOPs. Those of use who are old (d'oh!) will remember the math coprocessor (FPU) on the Intel DX chips. So strictly speaking this is a quad-core design, and specifically it is intended to handle heavier workloads (as I often state), but it is not directly comparable (per se) in raw core terms. Perhaps a more modern example would be mobile/smartphone processors (which are also ARM microcontrollers generally): the [big.LITTLE](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_big.LITTLE) concept of design, for example the A57/A53 combination as used on the Samsung Exynos.
For the latter/second point, core count obviously is a limited way of comparison anyway. Samsung's Polaris and Phoenix controllers (found in the 960 series and 970 series, respectively) are both penta-core (5-core) but the Phoenix is clocked a bit higher and of course has firmware improvements. Samsung's MJX controller - on the 860 EVO/QVO - is tri-core and based on their older SATA controller designs, but it often competes with the MX500's single-core (four-channel) SM2258. A keen eye will note the 860 EVO can be a bit faster with higher queue depths but we're limited by the protocol (AHCI) and interface (SATA) here. Same goes with the fact the MJX is an eight-channel design (which can be useful for capacity but is not really relevant with the density of NAND today).
To give a further example, the Phison S10 is a quad-core design (and also eight-channel) yet generally falls behind the competition. It is a bit of an older design and made for 2D/planar NAND specifically (as opposed to the SM2258), but additionally it relies on the older (and inferior) BCH error correction (ECC). So this tells us that controller design is important beyond just cores, although cores are specifically useful for NVMe as it overcomes the limitations of AHCI. There are other considerations (like WD's in-line [PCB design](https://images.anandtech.com/doci/13760/IMGP4396.jpg), NVMe 1.4 moving forward, superior LDPC support, etc) but core count can give a rough idea with NVMe drives as to the capacity for performance in "traditional" terms, all else being equal. Nevertheless, with the 4.0 drives coming out so far all being E16-based (which is an updated E12), I think it's wise to get ahead of questions about controller design.
edit
To add a bit more about Samsung's tri-core controller: it has one core for reads, one for writes, and one for host interaction. It also comes in a variety of clocks (e.g. 300/400/500 MHz). Pointing this out because it's quite possible to get that done with one or two cores.
Если Вам не повезло попасть в единичные случаи "для отчета", то демонстрация обыденности работы с клиентами поможет задуматься: а обращаться ли туда?
ГЛАВНОЕ ДЛЯ ЮРИСТОВ МПЦ — ЭТО УМЕНИЕ БЕГАТЬ... от клиентов 😁
Демонстрируем работу этих "спринтеров":
"В роликах МПЦ всё было красиво и прекрасно, тем более тогда, когда мы обращались к ним — зимой, крутили ролик про Плесень, где Миша очень хорошо и уверенно выступал", — приводим слова нашей подписчицы, которая в конце января обратилась в МПЦ. После передачи денег 03.02.2025 сразу же начались проблемы: то нет времени, то занят, то укусила собака (последнее ввело нас в безудержный смех).
Четыре с половиной месяца водил за нос клиента недоюрист. В середине июня 2025 года поступило требование вернуть деньги, после чего Орлик притворился мертвым и бросил клиента в черный список 😂.
В этом весь МПЦ. На камеру — одно, в реальной практике — другое.
Угрозы и запугивания клиентов после требования вернуть деньги. Всем советуем прочитать отзывы о МПЦ и МПЦ СЗО
В общем, вывод один: задумайтесь, прежде чем обращаться в МПЦ, внимательно изучите отзывы об этих "юристах".
После выхода поста от 19 июня 2025 года Михаил Орлик соизволил выйти на связь.
Обман клиента продолжается... 😂
Для выгораживания И.В.Матвеева Орлик сообщает, что не работает с МПЦ уже давно и на момент обращения , в конце января , его отношения с Матвеевым были закончены. Развеем эту ложь... : -на весенних судебных заседаниях по апелляции дела о банкротстве Игоря Матвеева , Михаил Орлик представлял его по доверенности от 11.04.2025 (скрин прилагаем).
Далее М. Орлик сообщает клиенту о переоформлении документов в Росреестре, что тоже является ложью. Нотариальная доверенность Михаилу не выдавалась, а без неё в Росреестре и разговаривать не будут. Но, видно, юристы МПЦ об этом не знают 😂 ( на самом деле клиентка сама подала заявление через Госуслуги, а М.Орлик просто ждёт исполнения по обращению, обманывая девушку).
Раскрываем суть аферной схемы работы МПЦ с клиентами: -заключение договоров от других ИП для снятия ответственности с МПЦ, Матвеев забирает свою долю, и далее клиенту просто морочат голову, имитируя деятельность.
Но когда вы поймёте эту ложь и придёте за возвратом денег, будьте готовы!!!😂 Денег вам не вернут, будут угрожать исками, физической расправой, вплоть до сексуального насилия 😂 (достаточно прочитать отзывы об организации).
Обращаемся к И.В. Матвееву !!! Игорь , верни деньги, попавшей в трудную ситуацию девушке и прекрати её обманывать !!!
You casualfags never change, just like the Western game industry. Time and again you invoke that word you so dimly understand: fun, fun, fun. Fun has become the casual's rosary. You chant it like some apotropaic charm meant to ward off the threat of individuality. What you fail to realize is that far too many people play games for these braindead, cheap thrills. By only playing the same generic shit, you're closing yourself off to a much more fruitful avenue of gaming experience: immersion. While you're off camping kids on Xbox Live for the thousandth time, smug in your shell of guns and swearing, I'm visiting richly detailed worlds with interesting stories, themes, and characters, worlds where my imagination can grow and flourish without being stunted by hollywood 'realism'. It's a kind of deep satisfaction and contentment your cheap brown and bloom QTE thrills could never hope to match. Tell me, when did being afraid of something that looks "childish" in favour of some bald space marine, DLC-infested, season pass, EA shooter of the year become encouraged; even praised? It's casual--disgustingly casual--to obsess over nitty grittygeneric "manly" heroes and try to emulate their ways like a teenage girl wearing her mother's makeup. And don't bother pithing me by citing Metacritic scores, or current Gamespot reviews to tell me what a good game is. You may be worth less than the fake tan on your steroids but even you should know better than to fall for what the marketers tell you is popular this month. So to recap, my musclehead friend, there's a time and a place for Uncharted and CoD, for cheap thrills and casual amusement, but for you that's been every day of your by-the-numbers life, wasting your time, just so that society can count you as another sheep in the proverbial barn.